A Systematic Review of Trauma-focused Interventions for Domestic Violence Survivors

Effectiveness of Treatments for Adverse Effects of Intimate Partner Violence

Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is a public health problem. It entails aggressive and violent, concrete, sexual, exact, and psychological acts by an intimate partner (Breiding et al., 2014; CDC, 2019). 1 in four women has reported experiencing partner violence at some point in their lifetime (Breiding et al., 2014; CDC, 2019). Over a third of women (36.4%) experience psychological aggression and nearly 41% of female survivors experience some form of physical injury during their lifetime (NISVS, 2012). Acute injuries including bruises, fractures, sensory damage, and internal injury, in add-on to long term ailments such as muscle-skeletal issues and metabolic issues, are significantly more than common among the victims of IPV than non-victims (Krug et al., 2002; Kilpatrick et al., 2003; Karakurt et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2020).

Mental health problems are likewise highly prevalent amidst the victims of IPV (Karakurt et al., 2014; Oram et al., 2017). Victims oftentimes report experiencing a broad range of Mail-Traumatic Stress Disorder symptoms (Schnurr and Green, 2004; Afifi et al., 2009; World Health Organization, 2013; Akyazi et al., 2018). Past research also reports the association between IPV and an increased likelihood of clinical depression and suicide attempts (Mapayi et al., 2012; Akyazi et al., 2018). Comorbidities of multiple mental health issues are likewise common such equally low, anxiety, and PTSD among IPV victims (Schnurr and Green, 2004; World Health Organization, 2013). IPV also affects victims economically due to challenges in finding employment lost productive days, and difficulty in accessing the available resources adding to their stressors (Ford-Gilboe et al., 2009).

Researchers and clinicians developed numerous treatment programs to improve the wellbeing of victims. Initially, local shelters were provided these programs to prevent farther violence and improve safety (Berk et al., 1986). Researchers found these shelter-based interventions to be beneficial for the victims in improving their electric current state of affairs (Clevenger and Roe-Sepowitz, 2009). In addition, advocacy services in shelters play an important role in victims' life satisfaction by helping them to navigate customs resource (Sullivan and Bybee, 1999).

Treatment programs vary in their goals, structures, and main arroyo as well as delivery methods such as the domestic violence shelters, customs mental health agencies, and hospitals. These programs depict from a multitude of therapy models such every bit cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), mindfulness, motivational interviewing, and expressive writing. Treatment modalities based on the CBT approach focuses on irresolute cerebral distortions in addressing the potential issues (Butler et al., 2006), motivational approaches focus on edifice intrinsic motivation to change behaviors (Rollnick and Miller, 1995), stress management approaches focus on improving coping skills to deal with stressors (Nam et al., 2020) and mindfulness-based approaches focus on improved awareness to reduce depressive and anxiety symptoms (Evans et al., 2008; Piet and Hougaard, 2011).

Additionally, patients who discuss, share, and write their traumatic experiences and intrusive memories are found to have better mental health outcomes and a greater reduction in PTSD, perceived stress, and depressive symptoms (Brewin et al., 2010). Furthermore, victims receiving psychoeducational materials and advocacy interventions study higher scores with their mood and behavior, lower depressive symptoms, and more social support (Tiwari et al., 2010).

The psychosocial wellbeing of survivors is multi-faceted, and many outcomes including mental and physical health, social back up, and cocky-efficacy are disquisitional to the wellbeing of a survivor. Nonetheless, although many different interventions exist to treat survivors of IPV, less is known about the effectiveness of these interventions. Prior systematic reviews and meta-analysis focused on the screening of IPV (Nelson et al., 2012; O'Doherty et al., 2014) or the effects of IPV on specific populations, such as pregnant women (Colina et al., 2016) and women who endure from substance abuse (Devries et al., 2014). These studies practise not specifically explore multiple critical outcomes on the psycho-social wellbeing of the victims of IPV. For this purpose, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve the psycho-social wellbeing of survivor victims and their related comorbidities.

Methods

Search Strategy and Identification of Studies

We followed The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions guidelines for the process of conducting high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses (Higgins and Green, 2011). We searched Pubmed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library to access the studies that were published on the topic. We used the keywords: "battered women," "abused women," "victim," "survivor," "domestic violence," "intimate partner violence," "partner abuse," "partner violence," "spousal corruption," "violence against women," "battering," and "concrete abuse," in combination with keywords "treatment," "intervention," "therapy," "counseling," "instruction," "prevention," "outcome," and "curriculum." Ii reviewers trained and independently assessed each title, abstract, and article for eligibility.

Nosotros used the predefined Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Time, and Setting (PICOTS) for inclusion and exclusion criteria to assess the eligibility of the studies (Higgins et al., 2019). Reviewers received preparation in the methodology. Studies included if (i) their sample composed of adult female person victims who are suffering from physical intimate partner violence (P), (2) they have active interventions designed for victims of IPV (I) (iii) they have a control group (C), they measure outcomes related to psycho-social wellbeing of physically abused women (O), they measure outcomes at pre-and post-intervention (T), and finally, all setting were included (Due south).

The exclusion criteria for the title and abstract review were the following: "no original data," "interventions that do not contain command," "not a peer-reviewed study," and "women under 18 years of age." In the article review, we as well excluded studies that presented the data in such a mode that did not allow the pooling of the results. In addition, nosotros excluded studies that did not direct assess the effectiveness of the intervention for female victims of IPV on outcomes related to wellbeing. We but included studies that used true command groups, i.due east., nosotros did non abstract data from studies that utilized not-completers as the control group. Nosotros included studies with minimal controls such as a no-handling grouping, safety advising pamphlets, information most community resources, referral cards, waitlist, and watching popular Tv set programs every bit the comparison grouping.

Data Abstraction

Two squad members abstracted information from included articles. Nosotros bathetic data serially by one researcher and so double-checked by the other researcher for accuracy. We used standard information brainchild forms to extract data on the population, report design, details about the intervention, and outcomes. The extracted data included the type of treatment, number of sessions, control, and setting. Nosotros bathetic mean and standard difference values amid intervention and control groups. Discrepancies between reviewers were resolved during the team meeting.

Data Assay

We combined studies when at least 3 studies measured the same result. We standardized the effect sizes. We used standardized mean difference (SMD) to pool results beyond studies for the same outcome since many studies used different measures. Nosotros used the I ^two measure to appraise heterogeneity. We conducted subgroup analyses when I ² > 50% and x or more studies (Northward > 10) to evaluate differences by specific a priori subgroups.

Quality of Studies

Nosotros used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool to evaluate the adventure of bias for the included studies (Armijo-Olivo et al., 2012). These risks include option bias, publication bias, reporting bias, functioning bias, detection bias, and attrition bias. Option bias refers to the lack of comparable groups for both intervention and control. Nosotros looked for strategies such as randomization in our cess of the studies. Selective outcome reporting indicates reporting bias. We looked for whether studies reported their outcome of interest and related outcomes for the study and whether unfavorable outcomes were reported in the article. For functioning and detection bias, we assessed whether there was blinding and whether interventions were carried out in similar conditions both for intervention and control groups. Attrition bias is present when there is incomplete outcome data. We used the driblet-out rate every bit an indicator of attrition bias. Squad members independently assessed report quality and then resolved conflicts together. If whatever conflicts could not exist resolved, they were brought to the larger written report team for resolution.

Results

Identification of Studies

Electronic databases [PubMed (North = 1,479), Ebsco/Host (North = one,499), Cochrane Library (N = i,474)] in improver to Mitt Searched articles (N = 29) revealed a full of 2,770 articles after duplicates were removed. During the title review, ii,508 articles were excluded since they were not specifically relevant to answering the question of involvement. In the title review, we screened for adult female victims who were suffering from physical IPV. Of the remaining 264 articles that underwent abstract review, 168 manufactures were excluded. The well-nigh frequent reasons for the exclusion of articles at this stage were that they did not include the study population (due north = 47), did not relate to the topic (n = 33), or did not have treatment (n = 29). Of the 96 manufactures that underwent full article review, 70 were excluded. The about frequent reasons for the exclusion of articles at this stage were having no result of interest (northward = 30), no pre- and mail service-test data that we could puddle with the rest of the studies (n = 19), and no original data (north = xiii). Twenty-five studies remained that met all the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Prisma flow diagram for the included studies is demonstrated in Figure one.

Effigy one. Prisma flow diagram for included studies of systematic review and meta-analysis for treatments for female victims of intimate partner violence.

Characteristics of Studies

We included a various set of studies in terms of the interventions they used, related co-morbidities, and psycho-social outcomes. Supplementary Table 1 shows the characteristics of these studies. Researchers conducted the studies in the United States (north = 14) (McFarlane et al., 2002; Kubany et al., 2004; Constantino et al., 2005; Koopman et al., 2005; Resick et al., 2008; Johnson et al., 2011, 2016; McWhirter, 2011; Zlotnick et al., 2011, 2019; Saftlas et al., 2014; Eden et al., 2015; Rhodes et al., 2015; Stevens et al., 2015; Glass et al., 2017), every bit well every bit in different countries, such as Australia (north = 1) (Taft et al., 2011), China (n = 1) (Tiwari et al., 2012), Greece (n = 1) (Kokka et al., 2019), Bharat (n = one) (Patel et al., 2019), Islamic republic of iran (n = ii) (Ghahari et al., 2016; Orang et al., 2018), Mexico (due north = 1) (Gupta et al., 2017), Spain (n = i) (Tirado-Muñoz et al., 2015), Turkey (n = 1) (Bahadir-Yilmaz and Öz, 2018), and the United Kingdom (n = i) (Ferrari et al., 2018). Many of the studies had samples with high percentages of Caucasian women (38%) while 12% of the studies had a majority of African-American women in their sample and 8% of the studies had a majority of Hispanic women in their sample. In the majority of studies women anile betwixt 30 and 50 years one-time.

Many of the studies conducted private interventions with a wide range of intervention types. These interventions included cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT, or augmented with CBT techniques), motivational interviewing, narrative expressive writing, trauma piece of work, advocacy services, telephone social support, and safety planning assist. Dissimilar intervention studies used facilitators with unlike skill levels. For example, a majority of the studies included masters or Ph.D. educated therapists, while some had advocacy services provided by trained nurses and advocates. Some other studies involved an internet-based intervention that does not have a facilitator simply rather has a reckoner interface.

Quality of the Studies and Risk of Bias

We considered selection bias, performance bias, reporting bias, detection bias, and attrition bias to assess the risk of bias for the current systematic review (Figure 2). Potential sources for the risk of these biases include inadequate randomization into groups, a high dropout rate, and a lack of information about inclusion criteria. Out of the 25 included studies, 15% had a depression drop-out charge per unit (<ten%), 34% had a moderate drop-out rate (10–19%), and 42% had a loftier driblet-out rate (≥20%). Fifteen percent of studies contained unclear inclusion criteria or loftier option and performance bias. This was due to unclear reporting of the study procedures, specially randomization. Most studies did not contain detection bias since the outcomes were measured consistently across groups, but 12% of studies contained unclear detection bias due to improper or unclear blinding of the effect assessors. Finally, we found reporting bias to be a low-risk bias for all but ane of the studies; this was due to unclear reporting of consequence results.

Figure 2. Run a risk of bias for included studies in the meta-analysis for treatments for female victims of intimate partner violence.

Intervention Furnishings With Minimal Command Groups

Mental Health

4 randomized intervention studies with 350 participants measured feet equally an effect (Figure 3). Female victims of IPV in the intervention groups had a lower level of anxiety at the post-test as compared to participants in the minimal command groups [standardized hateful departure (SMD) = −7.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) −eight.39 to −v.92] (Table 1). We evaluated 18 randomized intervention studies with a full of 2,407 female person victims of IPV for depression equally an event. Compared to the control groups, participants in treatment groups had lower levels of depressive symptoms at the mail-test for the intervention group (SMD = −0.26, CI −0.56 to −0.05) (Tabular array 1). We conducted subgroup analyses to elucidate the differences among intervention programs in terms of their effectiveness in treating depression among IPV victims since in that location were a sufficiently big number of studies that investigated low as an effect (n=18) and these studies had high heterogeneity (I ⁱⁱ = 86%). The results of the stratified analysis are shown in Figure iv. These results indicated that treatments augmented with expressive writing (SMD = −2.96, CI −5.76 to −0.17), empowerment (SMD = −2.86, CI −iv.68 to −1.0), advocacy (SMD = −2.89, CI −four.16 to −0.eighty), and CBT in combination with empowerment approach (SMD = −three.38, CI −five.36 to −1.4) were the treatments that significantly improved depressive symptoms amongst female victims. On the other hand, CBT lone (SMD = −ane.5, CI −3.xv–0.xiv), programs that address trauma (SMD = −2.36, CI −4.84–0.13), and programs with support components (SMD = 0.eighty, CI −0.13–1.72) did non bear witness a significant difference in the comeback of depressive symptoms as compared to control groups. 10 intervention studies with a full of 1,454 participants focused on PTSD as an consequence. When these studies were pooled together, the PTSD symptoms were not significantly reduced for the participants in the intervention groups compared to control groups (SMD = 0.23, CI −0.12–0.58). Nosotros conducted a subgroup analysis to further understand the differences amid the intervention programs that considered PTSD as an outcome since these x studies had moderate heterogeneity (I ² = 54%). Our results indicated that treatments utilizing CBT (SMD = −3.07, CI −half dozen.76 to −0.66), and CBT combined with empowerment (SMD = −5.five, CI −nine.12 to −1.88) resulted in significantly lower levels of PTSD symptoms as compared to controls. Trauma-focused (SMD = −3.37, CI −7.ten–0.35) and expressive writing approaches (SMD = −2.84 CI −half dozen.47–0.79) were not significantly reduced PTSD for the female victims of IPV in the intervention groups compared to control groups through at that place was a trend in comeback for some participants. These results are shown in Figure v.

Figure 3. Forest plots of the confidence interval and effect sizes of the interventions for female person victims of intimate partner violence.

Table 1. Results for meta-assay and subgroup analysis in the meta-analysis for treatments for female victims of intimate partner violence.

Figure 4. Subgroup analysis for handling of depression for female victims of intimate partner violence.

Effigy 5. Subgroup analysis for handling of PTSD for female victims of intimate partner violence.

Violence Reduction and Prophylactic Programs

Six studies with a full of i,482 participants aimed to diminish violence in the relationship. Overall, interventions that were targeting victims of violence diminished the frequency and severity of the violence victimization at the post-test as compared to the control groups (SMD = −0.92, CI −1.66 to −0.17). Iv studies with a total of 2,304 participants aimed to increase safety in the relationship. Nosotros found these interventions provide significant comeback in the safety of survivors as compared to control groups (SMD = 0.43, CI 0.04–0.83).

Cocky-Esteem and Efficacy

3 studies with 204 participants specifically measured self-esteem for their interventions. When we pooled these studies together, interventions did non bear witness significant comeback in cocky-esteem compared to command groups (SMD = i.33, CI −0.73–3.39). Eight studies with a total of one,552 participants aimed to improve the self-efficacy of the survivors of IPV. When nosotros pooled these studies together, interventions did non show significant improvement in self-efficacy of the participants as compared to control groups (SMD = 0.05, CI −0.07–0.18).

Improving Supportive Surroundings and Quality of Life

7 controlled studies with a total of 772 participants investigated a self-reported measure of overall health as an event. When pooled together, interventions used in these studies improved the self-reported overall health outcomes at the post-exam as compared to the command groups (SMD = 0.39, CI 0.12–0.66). Nine studies with 1,006 participants assessed the bear on of IPV interventions on social support. Overall, interventions significantly improved the social support systems for the victims of violence (SMD = 0.xl, CI 0.20–0.61). 6 studies with 498 participants assessed the impact of IPV interventions on reducing stress for survivors. When pooled together, these studies showed that interventions significantly improved stress levels as compared to control groups (SMD = −8.94, CI −ten.48 to −seven.40). Four studies reported on QoL with a total of 1,157 participants. Victims' QoL was institute to exist non affected by the interventions provided (SMD = −0.16, CI −0.36–0.05).

Discussion

The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of psychological interventions for developed women victims of IPV. Although anyone can be a victim of IPV, women are disproportionately affected by it. We identified 25 studies with 4,683 participants. We investigated outcomes including mental health-related problems, self-concept related difficulties as well equally supportive treatments. We examined changes in wellbeing by comparing the standardized pre-post-effects in each outcome against the intervention to the command groups. While several prior systematic reviews have explored specific IPV treatment effects on future conflict and violence, nosotros identified several novel findings in this review. First, interventions had more success than control groups in improving anxiety, stress-related bug, improving health and health intendance utilization, social support, prophylactic, and diminishing further violence. Second, in subgroup analyses, effective interventions for improving depressive symptoms included cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) augmented with empowerment, expressive writing, and psychological advancement programs. Sub-grouping analyses too indicated that CBT and CBT in combination with empowerment were constructive in improving PTSD symptoms.

Many interventions in this written report had face-to-face sessions with victims and helped outline condom behaviors, treatment of mental wellness problems, provided information nigh community resources, and support victims to improve their wellbeing over the phone or online. Some community-based intervention programs also take phone support services that were utilized by the victims (Stevens et al., 2015). Nosotros likewise observed that online platforms gained attention for reaching out, empowering victims, and improving safety. These online empowerment programs aim to ameliorate access and utilization of social, justice, and health intendance services for abused women, which added some personalization to these programs (Drinking glass et al., 2017; Koziol-Mclain et al., 2018).

Among the included studies, we observed that some programs aimed to target a single effect such every bit safety (Eden et al., 2015), while others worked from a co-morbidity perspective to address multiple issues that contribute to wellbeing (Kubany et al., 2004; Koopman et al., 2005; Ghahari et al., 2016). Others take added components to amend wellbeing in combination with empowerment (Ferrari et al., 2018) and self-efficacy (Gupta et al., 2017). Local shelters helped with the implementation of these programs (Constantino et al., 2005; Johnson et al., 2011), in a community setting (Eden et al., 2015), and through online platforms (Glass et al., 2017). Community-based intervention programs frequently focused on advancement, social support, career support, and safety behaviors (McWhirter, 2011; Tiwari et al., 2012; Eden et al., 2015).

Mental Health

The majority of the studies reported depression and PTSD equally their main consequence. Depression tin can interfere with how victims react to events, normal daily operation, and how they class relationships with others. Prior research showed that IPV victims are four times more likely to suffer from depression with high rates of suicidality (Anderson et al., 2003). When we pooled all together, the interventions were successful in decreasing depressive symptoms. Detailed subgroup analysis indicated that interventions such as CBT combined with empowerment, empowerment, expressive writing, advancement programs, and trauma-informed approaches were more than likely to lower the depression levels than studies that did not include these interventions.

It tin can be useful to interpret our findings in the context of a prior meta-analysis conducted on the effectiveness of psychotherapy programs on depression with 53 studies (Cuijpers et al., 2008). The prior metaanalysis concluded that in that location was no large differential effectiveness among major psychotherapies for the treatment of mild to moderate depression. However, they noted that interpersonal psychotherapy was slightly more effective than others, while supportive treatments were not equally effective. Our findings in the context of treating depression in IPV survivors were similar in that supportive treatments were non very helpful for the treatment of low. Even so, we found that, for IPV survivors, these supportive treatments tin can be benign for other outcomes such as improving social support and wellness. Some other meta-assay that investigated the differential effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions based on 209 studies indicated that such interventions had moderate effectiveness in treating anxiety and low, while this consequence was not stronger than that of traditional CBT (Khoury et al., 2013).

PTSD is another frequently reported mental wellness problem past IPV victims. Overall, our meta-analysis establish that PTSD symptoms were not significantly reduced by the interventions. In contrast, nosotros observed a slight increase in symptoms, which is consequent with the trauma literature in that some treatments may trigger traumatic memories. However, our subgroup analysis indicated that carefully targeted trauma-focused treatments, CBT, and CBT combined with empowerment were promising approaches to improve PTSD symptoms. Expressive writing and relational and safety approaches, on the other hand, did not attain statistical significance. Our finding is consistent with the literature that shows mixed results on the effectiveness of some approaches on improving PTSD symptoms (Abramowitz et al., 2001; Sloan et al., 2015). A similar meta-assay conducted on the efficacy of psychotherapy treatments for adult babyhood sexual abuse survivors with PTSD indicated that trauma-focused treatment was more efficacious as compared to non-trauma-focused treatments (Ehring et al., 2014).

Feet is another mental wellness result that is more probable to be reported if women have a tearing relationship (Mapayi et al., 2012). Nosotros found that interventions were successful in lowering the anxiety levels of IPV victims. A prior meta-analysis on the effectiveness of exercise training programs in anxiety reduction with 40 studies found that these programs on stress management resulted in lowering anxiety among adults (Long and Van Stavel, 1995).

Violence Reduction and Safety Programs

Southhelters, community agencies, NGOs, and government agencies frequently implement prophylactic and violence reduction programs for IPV victims. These programs focused on helping women exit abusive relationships by providing information virtually safety places, how to seek help, being aware of how to protect themselves before and subsequently a vehement atmospherics. When pooled together, these studies aiming to diminish violence and improve condom in the relationship improved these outcomes.

Cocky-Esteem and Efficacy

Past enquiry plant that IPV often erodes the victim'southward cocky-esteem (i.e., confidence about one's ain personal value and worth) and self-efficacy (i.east., confidence in his/her ability to achieve goals). Furthermore, highly correlated issues of emotional abuse such as constant degradation at the hands of abusers tin can also atomic number 82 to lower levels of confidence and cocky-value (Gondolf et al., 2002). Therefore, improving self-efficacy is viewed as a crucial issue by researchers. Nosotros observed improvement in self-esteem while there was no improvement observed on self-efficacy when the pre- and postal service-exam data from intervention groups were compared to control groups. Information technology is possible that improving self-efficacy might need a more invested handling approach, with a longer treatment time.

Supportive Environs and Quality of Life

Social support, stress, overall self-reported health, and QoL are oftentimes interlinked concepts. Survivors of IPV ofttimes suffer from health problems, excessive stress, difficulty accessing support, and, in turn, have lower QoL. Researchers developed intervention programs to deal with multiple bug that target stress, support, wellness, and QoL. Studies utilizing seeking help, support, and advocacy approaches reported improved self-reported health outcomes.

Clinical Implications

The results of this written report have few clinical implications. Current interventions have promising results in improving rubber and hereafter re-victimization, also equally providing supportive treatments in improving service utilization, social back up, and stress management. Methods such as providing a condom program, psychosocial pedagogy materials, and increasing social support were establish to assistance lower the re-victimization rate for women involved in IPV. On the other paw, mental health issues were found to exist more than circuitous to care for, peculiarly low and PTSD. For low, CBT combined with empowerment, empowerment, expressive writing, advocacy programs, and trauma work were more than probable to lower the low levels. Targeted trauma-focused treatments, CBT, and CBT combined with the empowerment approach are encouraging methods to meliorate PTSD symptoms. Overall, if the women feel empowered there is a better chance of improving multiple outcomes such equally depression, PSTD, and other underlying issues. Improving conviction in achieving the goals of the victim that is required for the healing procedure might need more time and more targeted approaches within a safe and supportive environment. Utilizing a complex arroyo that is taking larger social influences into account tin help in improving service utilization for prophylactic, social back up, and stress management. Improving the quality of life for women victims of IPV might exist more complicated equally multiple co-morbidities might be present, hence other bones and essential conditions (i.e., safety, violence reduction), underlying (i.east., depression, feet, PTSD), and interwoven issues (i.e., empowerment). These essential, underlying, and interwoven issues need to be identified and treated in combination to have an impact on QoL.

Limitations and Future Research

Limitations of this study included that many of the studies in the reviewed literature contained minimal controls that consisted of providing IPV literature or giving victims information well-nigh community resources. More than head-to-caput intervention research is needed to understand the comparative effectiveness of these interventions for various outcomes. These comparative effectiveness studies could too be helpful in developing a deeper agreement of mechanisms of change for these interventions. The common problem of high attrition in violence enquiry was observed in this meta-analysis equally well. Strategies, such every bit MI prior to interventions, could be helpful for lowering high drop-out rates in victim populations. Furthermore, futurity research can also apply pooled pre-post-test data from the studies without the control status to better sympathise these interventions and what works potentially in situations when in that location are not plenty controlled studies in subsequent meta-analyses.

Metanalysis is frequently used in clinical research by integrating the results of a number of independent studies to understand the effectiveness of a form of treatment (Haidich, 2010). This involved assessing the clinical changes in the women's lives besides as the quantifiable statistical effects. In this report, nosotros observed that studies investigating depression, PTSD, and anxiety as an upshot frequently utilized inventories and scales with clinical cut-off scores, indicative of not only statistical but too clinical changes. Furthermore, studies likewise collected information on qualitative changes while some others did not report this data. For example, Johnson's 2011 study shows that the Promise intervention was successful in reducing take a chance of re-abuse in women. They likewise reported higher levels of empowerment and social support months after the intervention was over. Kubany's study showed that lxx% of the women had good end-state performance, the reduction of PTSD and low symptoms, 6 months after the written report. In hereafter research, more information on the qualitative experiences of the women going through these changes will exist instrumental.

In summary, IPV creates negative physical and psychological effects on the wellbeing of victims and their families. The effects of IPV are long-lasting and require handling focusing on the complexity of the person past improving mental health issues, condom, and support. Overall, if women feel empowered, the chances of improving multiple outcomes are higher including depression and PSTD.

Information Availability Statement

The raw information supporting the conclusions of this article volition exist fabricated available past the authors, without undue reservation.

Author Contributions

GK, EK, and PK contributed to data analysis, writing, and editing. GK contributed to conceiving the idea, facilitated data collection, and management. EK, NJ, and PK contributed to reviewing the articles. PK and NJ contributed to data collection. SB contributed to supervising the information analysis and meta-analysis procedure, reading, reviewing, and editing. All authors contributed to the article and canonical the submitted version.

Funding

This publication was made possible by R01-LM012518 from the National Library of Medicine.

Author Disclaimer

The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Notation

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Whatsoever product that may exist evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is non guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Cloth for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/x.3389/fpsyg.2022.793021/full#supplementary-textile

References

Abramowitz, J. Southward., Tolin, D. F., and Street, K. P. (2001). Paradoxical effects of idea suppression: a meta-analysis of controlled studies. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 21, 683–703. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(00)00057-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Afifi, T. O., MacMillan, H., Cox, B. J., Asmundson, G. J., Stein, M. B., and Sareen, J. (2009). Mental wellness correlates of intimate partner violence in marital relationships in a nationally representative sample of males and females. J. Interpers. Violence 24, 1398–1417. doi: x.1177/0886260508322192

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Akyazi, S., Tabo, A., Guveli, H., Ilnem, M. C., and Oflaz, S. (2018). Domestic violence victims in shelters: what do we know nearly their mental health?. Customs Ment. Health J. 54, 361–369. doi: ten.1007/s10597-018-0240-i

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anderson, D. K., Saunders, D. G., Yoshihama, M., Bybee, D. I., and Sullivan, C. K. (2003). Long-term trends in depression among women separated from abusive partners. Viol. Against Women ix, 807–838. doi: 10.1177/1077801203009007004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Armijo-Olivo, S., Stiles, C. R., Hagen, N. A., Biondo, P. D., and Cummings, G. G. (2012). Cess of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane collaboration take chances of bias tool and the effective public health practice project quality assessment tool: methodological research. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 18, 12–eighteen. doi: ten.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.ten

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bahadir-Yilmaz, E., and Öz, F. (2018). The effectiveness of empowerment programme on increasing self-esteem, learned resourcefulness, and coping ways in women exposed to domestic violence. Issues Ment. Wellness Nurs. 39, 135–141. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2017.1368750

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berk, R. A., Newton, P. J., and Berk, South. F. (1986). What a deviation a day makes: an empirical study of the impact of shelters for battered women. J. Mar. Fam.48, 481–490. doi: 10.2307/352034

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Breiding, M. J., Chen, J., and Black, M. C. (2014). Intimate Partner Violence in the The states-−2010. Atlanta, GA: National Eye for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Brewin, C. R., Gregory, J. D., Lipton, Chiliad., and Burgess, Northward. (2010). Intrusive images in psychological disorders: characteristics, neural mechanisms, and handling implications. Psychol. Rev. 117, 210–232. doi: 10.1037/a0018113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Butler, A., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., and Beck, A. T. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 26, 17–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clevenger, B. J. M., and Roe-Sepowitz, D. (2009). Shelter service utilization of domestic violence victims. J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ. 19, 359–374. doi: 10.1080/10911350902787429

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Constantino, R., Kim, Y., and Crane, P. A. (2005). Effects of a social support intervention on health outcomes in residents of a domestic violence shelter: a pilot study. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 26, 575–590. doi: 10.1080/01612840590959416

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., Andersson, One thousand., and van Oppen, P. (2008). Psychotherapy for depression in adults: a meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 76, 909–922. doi: ten.1037/a0013075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Devries, K. M., Child, J. C., Bacchus, Fifty. J., Mak, J., Falder, G., Graham, K., et al. (2014). Intimate partner violence victimization and booze consumption in women: a systematic review and meta-assay. Habit 109, 379–391. doi: 10.1111/add.12393

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eden, K. B., Perrin, North. A., Hanson, G. C., Messing, J. T., Bloom, T. Fifty., Campbell, J. C., et al. (2015). Use of online prophylactic decision aid by abused women: effect on the decisional conflict in a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Prev. Med. 48, 372–383. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Ehring, T., Welboren, R., Morina, N., Wicherts, J. Chiliad., Freitag, J., and Emmelkamp, P. M. 1000. (2014). Meta-assay of psychological treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder in developed survivors of babyhood corruption. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 34, 645–657. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.x.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Evans, S., Ferrando, S., Findler, Grand., Stowell, C., Smart, C., and Haglin, D. (2008). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for generalized anxiety disorders. J. Anxiety Disord. 22, 716–721. doi: x.1016/j.janxdis.2007.07.005

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Ferrari, G., Feder, One thousand., Agnew-Davies, R., Bailey, J. E., Hollinghurst, S., Howard, L., et al. (2018). Psychological advocacy towards healing (PATH): a randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention in a domestic violence service setting. PLoS ONE 13:e0205485. doi: ten.1371/journal.pone.0205485

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ford-Gilboe, M., Wuest, J., Varcoe, C., Davies, L., Merritt-Gray, M., Campbell, J., et al. (2009). Modelling the effects of intimate partner violence and access to resources on women'south health in the early on years after leaving an abusive partner. Soc. Sci. Med. 68, 1021–1029. doi: x.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Ghahari, Southward., Khademolreza, North., Poya, F. S., Ghasemnejad, Due south., Gheitarani, B., and Pirmoradi, Grand. R. (2016). Effectiveness of mindfulness techniques in decreasing anxiety and depression in women victims of spouse corruption. Asian J. Pharm. Res. Health Care. 9, 28–33. doi: 10.18311/ajprhc/2017/7644

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glass, N. E., Perrin, N. A., Hanson, G. C., Flower, T. L., Messing, J. T., Clough, A. Due south., et al. (2017). The longitudinal bear upon of an internet safety decision aid for abused women. Am. J. Prev. Med. 52, 606–615. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gondolf, E. W., Heckert, D. A., and Kimmel, C. K. (2002). Nonphysical abuse amidst batterer program participants. J. Fam. Viol. 17, 293–314. doi: 10.1023/A:1020304715511

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, J., Falb, K. L., Ponta, O., Xuan, Z., Campos, P. A., Gomez, A. A., et al. (2017). A nurse-delivered, dispensary-based intervention to address intimate partner violence among low-income women in Mexico Urban center: findings from a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 15:128. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0880-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haidich, A. B. (2010). Meta-analysis in medical inquiry. Hippokratia. 14, 29–37.

Google Scholar

Higgins, J. P., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., et al. (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Higgins, J. P. T., and Light-green, Due south. (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (5.1.0). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available online at: www.cochrane-handbook.org (accessed February 05, 2017).

Google Scholar

Loma, A., Pallitto, C., McCleary-Sills, J., and Garcia-Moreno, C. (2016). A systematic review and meta-assay of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and selected nascence outcomes. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstetr. 133, 269–276. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.10.023

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johnson, D. M., Johnson, North. L., Perez, Southward. One thousand., Palmieri, P. A., and Zlotnick, C. (2016). Comparison of calculation treatment of PTSD during and after a shelter stay to standard care in residents of battered women's shelters. J. Trauma. Stress 29, 365–373. doi: x.1002/jts.22117

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johnson, D. M., Zlotnick, C., and Perez, Southward. (2011). Cognitive-behavioral handling of PTSD in residents of battered women's shelters: results of a randomized clinical trial. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.79, 542–551. doi: ten.1037/a0023822

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karakurt, M., Patel, V., Whiting, Yard., and Koyutürk, One thousand. (2017). Mining electronic health records data: domestic violence and adverse health effects. J. Fam. Viol. 32, 79–87. doi: ten.1007/s10896-016-9872-five

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khoury, B., Lecomte, T., Fortin, Thou., Masse, M., Therien, P., Bouchard, V., et al. (2013). Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 33, 763–771. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, D. Thousand., Ruggiero, Thou. J., Acierno, R., Saunders, B. E., Resnick, H. S., and Best, C. 50. (2003). Violence and risk of PTSD, major depression, substance corruption/dependence, and comorbidity. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 71, 692–700. doi: ten.1037/0022-006X.71.iv.692

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kokka, A., Mikelatou, M., Fouka, G., Varvogli, L., Chrousos, G. P., and Darviri, C. (2019). Stress management and health promotion in a sample of women with intimate partner violence: A randomized controlled trial. J. Interpers. Violence 34, 2034–2055 doi: 10.1177/0886260516658759

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koopman, C., Ismailji, T., Holmes, D., Classen, C. C., Palesh, O., and Wales, T. (2005). The furnishings of expressive writing on pain, low and PTSD symptoms in survivors of intimate partner violence. J. Wellness Psychol. 10, 211–221. doi: 10.1177/1359105305049769

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Koziol-Mclain, J., Vandal, A. C., Wilson, D., Null-Raja, S., Dobbs, T., Mclean, C., et al. (2018). Efficacy of a web-based condom decision aid for women experiencing intimate partner violence: randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 19:e426. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8617

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kubany, E. Southward., Loma, East. E., Owens, J. A., Iannce-Spencer, C., McCaig, M. A., Tremayne, Yard. J., et al. (2004). Cognitive trauma therapy for battered women with PTSD (CTT-BW). J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 72, 3–18. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.1.three

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, L.Y., Bush, West.Due south., Koyutürk, M., and Karakut, G. (2020). Interplay between traumatic brain injury and intimate partner violence: Data driven assay utilizing electronic health records. BMC Women's Health. 20, 269. doi: ten.1186/s12905-020-01104-iv

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mapayi, B., Makanjuola, R. O. A., Mosaku, S. K., Adewuya, O. A., Afolabi, O., Aloba, O. O., et al. (2012). Impact of intimate partner violence on anxiety and depression amongst women in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Arch. Womens Ment. Health sixteen, 11–18. doi: 10.1007/s00737-012-0307-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McFarlane, J., Malecha, A., Gist, J., Watson, K., Batten, E., Hall, I., et al. (2002). An intervention to increase safety behaviors of abused women: results of a randomized clinical trial. Nurs. Res. 51, 347–354. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200211000-00002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McWhirter, P. T. (2011). Differential therapeutic outcomes of community-based grouping interventions for women and children exposed to intimate partner violence. J. Interpers. Viol. 26, 2457–2482. doi: 10.1177/0886260510383026

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nam, B., Kim, J. Y., and Ryu, West. (2020). Intimate partner violence against women amidst North Korean refugees: a comparison with South Koreans. J. Interpers. Viol. 35, 2947–2970. doi: ten.1177/0886260517699949

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nelson, H. D., Bougatsos, C., and Blazina, I. (2012). Screening women for intimate partner violence: a systematic review to update the U.s.a. preventive services task force recommendation. Ann. Intern. Med. 156, 796–808. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-11-201206050-00447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

O'Doherty, Fifty. J., Taft, A., Hegarty, Grand., Ramsay, J., Davidson, L. L., and Feder, Yard. (2014). Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: abridged cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 348, g2913. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2913

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Orang, T., Ayoughi, S., Moran, J. K., Ghaffari, H., Mostafavi, S., Rasoulian, M., et al. (2018). The efficacy of narrative exposure therapy in a sample of Iranian women exposed to ongoing intimate partner violence. Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 25, 827–841. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2318

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patel, A. R., Weobong, B., Patel, V. H., and Singla, D. R. (2019). Psychological treatments for depression amid women experiencing intimate partner violence. Arch. Womens Ment. Health 22, 779–789. doi: 10.1007/s00737-019-00992-2

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Piet, J., and Hougaard, East. (2011). The effect of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for the prevention of relapse in recurrent depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 31, 1032–1040. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.05.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Resick, P. A., Galovski, T. E., Uhlmansiek, Thou. O. B., Scher, C. D., Clum, Thou. A., and Immature-Xu, Y. (2008). A randomized clinical trial to dismantle components of cerebral processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in female person victims of interpersonal violence. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 76, 243–258. doi: ten.1037/0022-006X.76.2.243

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rhodes, 1000., Rodgers, Thousand., Sommers, M., Hanlon, A., Chittams, J., Doyle, A., et al. (2015). Cursory motivational intervention for IPV and heavy drinking in the emergency section: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314, 466–477. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8369

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saftlas, A., Harland, Grand., Wallis, A., Cavanaugh, J., Dickey, P., and Peek-Asa, C. (2014). Motivational interviewing and IPV: a randomized trial. Ann. Epidemiol. 24, 144–150. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.10.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schnurr, P. P., and Green, B. L. (2004). Understanding relationships amid trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder, and health outcomes. Adv. Mind-Body Med. 20, 18–29.

Google Scholar

Sloan, D. 1000., Sawyer, A. T., Lowmaster, S. E., Wernick, J., and Marx, B. P. (2015). Efficacy of narrative writing as an intervention for PTSD: does the bear witness support its utilize? J. Contemp. Psychother. 45, 215–225. doi: x.1007/s10879-014-9292-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stevens, J., Scribano, P. 5., Marshall, J., Nadkarni, R., Hayes, J., and Kelleher, M. J. (2015). A trial of telephone support services to forbid further intimate partner violence. Viol. Against Women 21, 1528–1547. doi: 10.1177/1077801215596849

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sullivan, C. K., and Bybee, D. I. (1999). Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 67, 43–53. doi: x.1037/0022-006X.67.ane.43

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Taft, A. J., Pocket-sized, R., Hegarty, G. L., Watson, L. F., Gilded, L., and Lumley, J. A. (2011). Mothers' advocates in the community (MOSAIC)-non-professional mentor support to reduce intimate partner violence and depression in mothers: a cluster randomised trial in primary intendance. BMC Public Wellness 11, S5. doi: x.1186/1471-2458-xi-S5-S1

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tirado-Muñoz, J., Gilchrist, 1000., Lligoña, Eastward., Gilbert, L., and Torrens, M. (2015). A group intervention to reduce intimate partner violence amongst female person drug users. Adicciones 27, 168–178. doi: x.20882/adicciones.703

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tiwari, A., Fong, D. Y., Wong, J. Y., Yuen, Grand. H., Yuk, H., Pang, P., et al. (2012). Safety-promoting behaviors of customs-dwelling driveling Chinese women after an advocacy intervention. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 49, 645–655. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.12.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tiwari, A., Fong, D. Y. T., Yuen, K. H., Yuk, H., Pang, P., Humphreys, J., et al. (2010). Effect of an advancement intervention on mental health in Chinese women survivors of intimate partner violence: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 304, 536–543. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Earth Health Arrangement (2013). Global and Regional Estimates of Violence Against Women: Prevalence and Wellness Furnishings of Intimate Partner Violence and Non-Partner Sexual Violence. Globe Health Organization. Available online at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/85239

Google Scholar

Zlotnick, C., Capezza, N. Grand., and Parker, D. (2011). An interpersonally based intervention for low-income meaning women with intimate partner violence: a pilot written report. Curvation. Womens Ment. Health fourteen, 55–65. doi: 10.1007/s00737-010-0195-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zlotnick, C., Wernette, K. T., and Raker, C. A. (2019). A randomized controlled trial of a computer-based cursory intervention for victimized perinatal women seeking mental health handling. Curvation. Womens Ment. Health. 22, 315–325. doi: ten.1007/s00737-018-0895-i

PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

arndtessurn.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.793021/full

Share this post